Measuring institutional respect and State capacities in South America. A relational analysis on four dimensions of the Worldwide Governance Indicators (2017-2018)

Authors

  • Nicolás Vladimir Chuchco Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero (UNTREF), Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios Avanzados (CIEA). Sáenz Peña, Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-201X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/awari.66

Keywords:

Governance, Social Network Analysis, Institutional Quality, Two Mode Networks

Abstract

The measurement of “good governance” has become an object of (e) valuation by international actors. In this regard, it has occupied the attention of investors, donors, private companies, development agencies, academics, journalists, governments, and credit organizations in the last 30 years, accompanied by a greater flow of international investments to under developed economies. Among these indicators, the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) produced by the World Bank stand out. Although these numbers are not used directly by the Bank to condition resources, they are used by organizations such as the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) to decide in which countries allocate financial aid based on the results of some of the dimensions of these indicators. For this reason, this work seeks to investigate the relationships networks that exist between the indicators and the organizations that participate in providing data, asking about what type of organizations produce inputs of certain dimensions, what relationships they have with each other and with others, in terms of participation, and where the central houses that produce these inputs are located geographically. For this, we have analyzed and characterized the relationship network of production about four dimensions of the WGI indicators, according to the organizations that provided data for South America during the period 2017-2018. The main results obtained indicate that a small number of international organizations in the Northern hemisphere have greater participation in the supply of inputs, highlighting private companies or organizations linked to them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., y Robinson, J. (2005). Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-run Growth. En P. Aghion y S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (pp. 385-472). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Apaza, C. R. (2009). Measuring Governance and Corruption through the Worldwide Governance Indicators: Critiques, Responses, and Ongoing Scholarly Discussion. Political Science and Politics, 42(1), 139-143

Arndt, C. (2009). Governance Indicators. Tesis de doctorado, Maastricht University, Maastricht.

Arndt, C., y Oman, C. (2006). Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators. Paris: OECD Development Centre.

Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., y Vespignani, A. (2004). The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(11), 3747-3752. doi:10.1073/pnas.0400087101

Bastian, M., Heymann, S., y Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Ponencia presentada en la Third international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, 18-20 de mayo.

Borgatti, S. P., y Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2- mode data. Social Networks, 19(3), 243-270

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., y Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

Borgatti, S. P., y Halgin, D. (2010). Analizing afiliation networks. En P. Carrington y J. Scott (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London.

Botto, M. (Ed.). (2007). Saber y política en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Prometo Libros.

Daniel, C., y Vommaro, G. (2016). Poor in Numbers: A Contribution to a Social History of Social Statistics in Contemporary Argentina. Journal of Latin American Studies, 49(3), 463-487. doi:10.1017/S0022216X16001899

Erkkilä, T., y Piironen, O. (2014). (De) politicizing good governance: the World Bank Institute, the OECD and the politics of governance indicators. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(4), 344-360. doi:10.1080/13511610.2013.850020

Everett, M. G., y Borgatti, S. P. (2012). The dual-projection approach for two-mode networks. Social Networks, 35(2), 204-210. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socn et.2012.05.004

Fine, B., y Waeyenberge, E. V. (2007). Corrigiendo a Stiglitz: de la información al poder en el mundo del desarrollo. En C. Leys y L. Panitch (Eds.), Socialist Register 2006: diciendo la verdad (pp. 185-209). Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

Hodgson, G. M. (2015). Conceptualizing capitalism: institutions, evolution, future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Karns, M. P., y Mingst, K. A. (2004). The politics and processes of global governance. Londres: Lynne Rienner Publishers

Kaufmann, D., y Kraay, A. (2018, 03/10/2019). Worldwide Governance Indicators. Yearly basis Recuperado desde http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#reports

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., y Mastruzzi, M. (2007). The Worldwide Governance Indicators Project: Answering the Critics. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4149. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., y Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2008. Washington D.C.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., y Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues.World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430. Recuperado desde http://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130

Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (2003). Governing as Governance. Londres: Sage.

Latapy, M., Magnien, C., y Del Vecchio, N. (2008). Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks. Social networks, 30(1), 31-48

Malito, D. V. (2015). The difficulty of measuring Governance and Stateness: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 38.

Mawdsley, E. (2007). The Millennium Challenge Account: Neo-liberalism, poverty and security. Review of International Political Economy, 14(3), 487-509

Opsahl, T. (2013). Triadic closure in two-mode networks: Redefining the global and local clustering coefficients. Social Networks 35(2), 159-167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.07.001

Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., y Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245-251

Pereyra, S. (2012). La política de los escándalos de corrupción desde los años 90. Desarrollo Económico: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 52(206), 255-284

Pereyra, S. (2013). Política y transparencia. La corrupción como problema público. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI editores.

Pestre, D. (2003). Sciencie, argent et politique. Un essai d´ínterprétation Paris: Editions Quae.

Reynoso, C. (2011). Redes sociales y complejidad: Modelos interdisciplinarios en la gestión sostenible de la sociedad y la cultura. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sb.

Scott, J. (2011). Social network analysis: developments, advances, and prospects. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 1(1), 21-26. doi:10.1007/s13278-010-0012-6

Stone, D. (2015). The Group of 20 transnational policy community: governance networks, policy analysis and think tanks. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0(0), 1-19. doi:10.1177/0020852314558035

Wilkis, A. (Ed.). (2018). El poder de (e)valuar. La producción monetaria de jerarquías sociales, morales y estéticas en la sociedad contemporánea. San Martín: UNSAM-Edita.

Zurbriggen, C. (2011). Gobernanza: una mirada desde América Latina. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 19(38), 39-64

Published

23-07-2020

How to Cite

Chuchco, N. V. (2020). Measuring institutional respect and State capacities in South America. A relational analysis on four dimensions of the Worldwide Governance Indicators (2017-2018). AWARI, 1(1), e012. https://doi.org/10.47909/awari.66

Issue

Section

Original article